Asset Management and Reliability

Maintenance budgets are frequently spread evenly across assets that differ enormously in consequence of failure. This programme covers criticality assessment, maintenance strategy selection and the reliability analysis that tells you whether a strategy is working.

It runs 6 times over the published calendar, in 6 cities. Every date is the same programme with the same content and the same certificate.

• Assess asset criticality by consequence of failure.
• Select a maintenance strategy appropriate to failure mode.
• Use failure data to test whether a strategy is working.
• Build a maintenance plan that follows criticality.

Maintenance and reliability engineers, asset managers, and operations leads accountable for availability.

Short input, then work. Across 5 days of roughly 6 teaching hours each, the balance sits deliberately with the second: a programme where the trainer talks for six hours produces notes rather than capability.

• Your own material

  Exercises run on situations delegates bring, not on a case study written for a different organisation in a different decade.

• A capped cohort

  Small enough that everybody is asked something. Executive programmes are capped tighter still.

• Practice under scrutiny

  The difficult conversation, the challenged assumption, the decision defended out loud. Judgement is not built by watching.

• Something to take back

  Each day ends with a thing you can use on Monday rather than a slide deck you will not reopen.

• A criticality assessment for the delegate's asset base.
• A strategy selection record per asset class.
• A reliability measure set.
• A maintenance plan aligned to criticality.

A GATI certificate recording what you attended, issued after the programme has run and attendance has been taken. Attending at least 80 per cent of the days earns a certificate of completion; attending less earns a certificate of attendance stating exactly what was attended.

Every certificate carries a code that anybody can check against GATI's own record, which is what makes it worth holding. It records participation. This site will not imply one it does not have.